SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(SC) 878

ARIJIT PASAYAT, D.K.JAIN
State of Haryana – Appellant
Versus
Suresh – Respondent


Judgment

Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J.—

1.Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Punjab and Haryana High Court allowing the Criminal Appeal filed by the respondent, who was found guilty of offence punishable under Section 18 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act,1985 (in short the ‘Act’) and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years and to pay a fine of Rs.1,00,00/- with default stipulations.

2.The High Court directed acquittal on the ground that there was non-compliance with the mandatory requirements of Section 50 of the Act.

3.Background facts in a nutshell are as follows.

The case of the prosecution is that on 01.04.1987, the patrolling party consisting of the sub-inspector and two assistant sub-inspectors and four constables were present at Rohtak. At about 5.10 a.m. a bus of Haryana Roadways came from Delhi and the same was stopped by patrolling party. The accused-respondent, Suresh was also one of the passengers travelling in the bus with an attachi-case. The Sub-Inspector of Police searched the attache case by taking the same from the hands of the accused. When the attachi case was searched, a false bottom made of p






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top