D.K.JAIN, C.K.THAKKER
RAJ KUMAR @ RAJU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARANCHAL – Respondent
JUDGMENT:
C.K. THAKKER, J.
1. This appeal is filed by Raj Kumar @ Raju-accused No.1 in Sessions Trial No. 14 of 1983. He was convicted for an offence punishable under Section 396 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) along with three other accused and ordered to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years and to pay fine of Rs.2,000, in default of payment of fine, to undergo additional imprisonment for one year. The said order was passed by the II Addl. Sessions Judge, Nainital on August 9, 1985. The appellant preferred an appeal against the said judgment and order which was registered as Crimial Appeal No. 2128 of 1985 in the High Court of Allahabad and was re-numbered as Criminal Appeal No. 315 of 2001 in the High Court of Uttaranchal at Nainital and was dismissed by the High Court on December 16, 2006.
2. The case of the prosecution was that on September 24, 1982 one Tilak Raj-PW1 submitted a written report at Police Station, Khatima stating therein that when he reached his house for taking lunch at about 12.30 p.m., he saw Raj Kumar @ Raju, Pushpendra Singh, Swadesh Chandra @ Gappu and Nirankar in his house. All the accused were dragging his wife who was soaked in blood. According to Ti
Dalip Singh and Ors. v. State of Punjab
Mohan Singh v. State of Rajasthan
Krishna Govind Patil v. State of Maharashtra
Ram Dular Rai v. State of Bihar
Ram Shankar Singh and Ors. v. State of Uttar Pradesh
Shyam Behari v. State of Uttar Pradesh
Saktu and Anr. v. State of U.P.
Maina Singh v. State of Rajasthan
REFERRED TO : Ram Lakhan v. State of Uttar Pradesh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.