SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(SC) 125

K.JAYACHANDRA REDDY, S.R.PANDIAN
Ramdeo Rai Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
B.B.Singh, G.S.MISHRA, TAPAS RAY

JUDGMENT

S. RATNAVEL PANDIAN, J.:- This appeal is preferred by the appellant, Ramdeo Rai Yadav, who was the first accused in the Sessions Trial Case No. 9/84 in the Court of 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Darbhanga, challenging his conviction under S. 302, I.P.C. and the sentence of imprisonment for life imposed therefore.

2. Adumbrated in brief, the facts of the prosecution case are as follows :

This appellant and four other accused who all were arrayed as accused Nos. 1-5 took their trial under S. 396 of the Indian Penal Code, alternatively under S. 302, I.P.C. on the allegations that on 6-5-1983 at about 8.00 p.m. they all while attempting to commit dacoity in the house of one Santosh Kumar Pansari (PW-8) in Mohalla Senapat of Darbhanga caused the death of PW-8s brother J. Prakash Pansari.

3. On the night of the fateful day, PW-8 was in his house. His brother, the deceased herein, Munshi Dashrath Sah (PW-2) and another Munshi Arjun Sah (not examined) were also present in a room abutting the outer verandah and were checking the account books of their family firm. At that point of time, PW-8 saw two miscreants entering the verandah and taking position near the door of the outer room.











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top