Supreme Court of India
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1264 OF 2005
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.S. SIRPURKAR
Babasaheb Apparao Patil
Versus
State of Maharashtra
Decided on : 28-11-2008
Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 302 read with Section 34 – Appeal Against Conviction – Acquitted - jurisdiction murder - These persons were Accused Trial Court convicted all accused for said offence and sentenced them to suffer rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of each with default stipulation - All convicts preferred an appeal to High Court - Although accused No.2 and 4 expired during the pendency of appeal yet High Court dealt with their appeals as well - High Court confirmed conviction of appellant herein and accused but acquitted remaining two accused giving them benefit of doubt - Held, Evidence of these two witnesses stands corroborated by the medical evidence, which clearly shows that several blows were given t deceased by and a fire arm injury was also found over abdomen of deceased - Conduct of in going to house of his uncle instead of reporting incident to police cannot be said to be unnatural impairing creditworthiness of his evidence - Post-event conduct of a witness varies from person to person - It cannot be a cast iron reaction to be followed as a model by everyone witnessing such event - Different persons would react differently on seeing any serious crime and their behaviour and conduct would therefore be different - Appeal is Dismissed
Judgment :-
D.K. Jain, J.
1. This appeal arises out of the judgment rendered by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, in Criminal Appeal No. 686 of 1988, confirming the conviction of the appellant for offence under Section 302 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short ‘IPC).
2. As many as four accused came to be tried by the Addl. Sessions Judge, Solapur in Sessions Case No.198 of 1987. These persons were Babasaheb Apparao Patil – Accused No.1, Tanaji Manikrao Patil - Accused No.2, Appasha Dharmarao Patil Accused No.3 and Prakash Limbanna Koli - Accused No.4. The Trial Court convicted all the accused for the said offence and sentenced them to suffer rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.1000/-each, with default stipulation. All the convicts preferred an appeal to the High Court. Although accused No.2 and 4 expired during the pendency of the appeal, yet the High Court dealt with their appeals as well. The High Court confirmed the conviction of the appellant herein and accused No.2 but acquitted the remaining two accused, giving them the benefit of doubt.
3. According to the prosecution in village Boramani, District Solapur, there are two rival parties. Manikrao Patil was the leader of one party and the deceased - Baburao Vibhute was the leader of the other party. Tanaji Manikrao Patil -Accused No.2 is the son of Manikrao Patil. Babasaheb Apparao Patil-Accused No.1 and Appasha Dharmarao Patil - Accused No.3 are cousin brothers of Tanaji. Prakash Limbanna Koli-Accused No.4 is not related to other three accused but was known to them. On 7th June, 1989, one Abhimanyu Rama Bhagare had assaulted the said Manikrao Patil, father of Accused No.2 by using a Sattur. Abhimanyu was a good friend of the deceased Baburao Vibhute. Manikrao suspected that assault on him by Abhimanyu had been instigated by the deceased Baburao and therefore, he held a grudge against him.
4. On 19th June, 1986, the deceased - Baburao Vibhute, Sidram Birajdar (PW-10) Sarpanch of village Boramani, Prakash Rajguri (PW-11), driver of the deceased and one Suresh Rokade left for Solapur by jeep because the deceased had some work there. On completion of the work, at around 3.00 p.m. they started the return journey. On their way, they stopped at hotel Khansaheb to take some snacks. But since vegetarian snacks were not available, they procured beer from outside and had it in the hotel. At the hotel, Prakash (PW-11) saw Shivaji Rajguru (PW-26), who was in the service of the deceased and had owed some money to him. He, accordingly informed the deceased, who demanded money from Shivaji but on his failure to oblige him, he belaboured him and made him sit in the jeep to take him to his village. When the jeep came near the village of Shivaji, his wife (PW-19) stopped it. The deceased got down from the jeep and was talking with the wife of Shivaji. While the conversation was going on, another jeep came from the side of Solapur. All the four accused got down from the jeep. Accused No.1 was armed with a pistol; Accused No.2 got down wielding an instrument like jamiya (dagger); Accused No.3 came to the rear side of the jeep of the deceased and grabbed him from behind; Accused A-2 gave a dagger blow on his stomach. When the deceased fell down on the ground, Accused No.1 fired a bullet shot at his chest. On seeing the assault, Sidram (PW-10) ran away out of fear. At a nearby petrol pump, he boarded a truck and reached Hyderabad. Prakash (PW-11) the driver of the jeep, also fled from the scene and on reaching Solapur, he went to the house of his uncle (PW-18) and narrated the entire incident to him.
5. On 19th June, 1986 itself, at about 9.10 p.m., a phone call was received by CPI Bhaskar Patil (PW-28) from an unknown person informing him about the murder of Baburao Vibhute. The said informant is stated to have disclosed that the murder had been committed by Babasaheb Patil - Accused No.1 and Tanaji Patil – Accused No. 2. PW-28, after making the ent
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.