SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(SC) 701

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
B.S. CHAUHAN & FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA, JJ.
BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LTD. - Appellant
VERSUS
R.S. AVTAR SINGH & CO. - Respondent
Civil Appeal No. 7239 of 2012 (@ SLP (C) No.3272 of 2009)
Decided On : 05-10-2012.

IMPORTANT POINT
Part payment of decretal amount and interest - principles for appropriation and calculation of interest discussed.

Headnote:(a) Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Order XXI, rule 1 r/w section 34; and section 3(3)(c), Interest Act - "Payable under a decree" - Date of commencement of interest as awarded changed by Rule of the Court - Award granted interest till the decree was made, i.e. the date of Rule of the Court - Award and decree both granting interest on award amount - Hence the interest post decree cannot include interest till decree. (Para 15)

        (b) Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Order XXI, rule 1 - Does not confine to decretal amount - It includes all monies. (Para 16)

        (c) Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Order XXI, Rules 1 and 4 - Rs. 1 crore paid by judgment debtor as part payment of entire dues on the date of notice and also withdrawn by decree holder - The amount should be appropriated first towards interest and the balance towards principal - No interest will accrue on amount of principal so appropriated. (Para 24)

        (2006) 8 SCC 457; (1996) 2 SCC 71 - Relied upon

        (2002) 1 SCC 367; (2012) 1 SCC 302 - Referred

       Facts of the case:

        This case relates to execution of an arbitration award.

       Finding of the Court:

        There is no infirmity in impugned judgment.

       Result : Appeal dismissed.

       

JUDGMENT

Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla, J. - Leave granted.

2. The judgment debtor is the appellant before us. This appeal is directed against the judgment of the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court dated 03.11.2008 in EFA (OS) No.9 of 2002. The respondent undertook some contract work with the appellant in respect of which the dispute arose as regards the payment to be made by the appellant. The dispute went before the sole Arbitrator who passed an award on 15.03.1982 which was made the Rule of Court after protracted litigation. Thus after the award became final and conclusive, the respondent herein filed Execution Petition No.208/2000 contending that the appellant did not furnish the award amount in its entirety. The appellant while resisting the Execution Petition, also filed EA No.522 of 2000 under Section 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure by taking the stand that entire award amount has been fully paid and, therefore, there was nothing to be granted in the Execution Petition. The learned Single Judge dismissed the objections by order dated 12.07.2002 which was the subject matter of appeal in which the impugned judgment came to be passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Delhi.

3. The issue centres around the interpretation of Order XXI Rules (1), (4) and (5) of CPC read with Section 34 CPC and Section 3 (3) (c) of Interest Act. Though the legal issue falls within the narrow compass, to appreciate the respective contentions of the parties, certain details about award dated 15.03.1982, the order of the Court which granted the seal of approval to the award dated 31.05.1985 in suit No.594-A/1982, the order of the Division Bench dated 18.07.2000 by which the challenge to the award and the order dated 31.05.1985 came to be rejected and the subsequent order dated 31.07.2000 declining to recall the earlier order dated 18.07.2000, thereafter the order of the learned Single Judge came to be passed on 12.07.2000 in EA No.522 of 2000 in Execution case No.208 of 2000 which was subject matter of challenge in the impugned order of the Division Bench dated 03.11.2008 in EFA (OS) No.9 of 2002, have to be stated. When we refer to the award of the Arbitrator dated 15.03.1982, we find the following relief which was granted in favour of the respondent: The Award Claimants claims No. 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,10,12,13,14 & 15 I hold that the claimants M/s R.S. Avtar Singh & Co. are entitled to a sum of Rs.1,42,24,894/- (Rupees one crore forty two lacs twenty four thousand eight hundred and ninety four only) against all their claims and I also hold that the claimants are entitled for interest and, I, therefore, award a sum of Rs.1,42,24,894/- (Rupees one crore forty two lacs twenty four thousand eight hundred and ninety four only) in favour of the claimants with interest @ 12 % per annum on the said amount of the award from 6-1-1981 till the date of payment or decree whichever is earlier.

Claimants claim No.9 As this claim was withdrawn by the Claimants in the hearing held on 12/9 and 13/9/81, no award is made against this claim.

Respondents counter-claims Nos. 1,2 & 3:-

I hold that the Respondents M/s. Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. are entitled to a sum of Rs.56,420/- (Rupees Fifty Six thousand four hundred & twenty only) against all their counterclaims and I, therefore, award sum of Rs.56,420/- (Rupees fifty six thousand four hundred & twenty only) in favour of the respondents.

The parties are left to bear their own costs. This disposes of claimants claim No.16 regarding costs. The above award is made and published by me on this day of 15th Marcy, 1982 at Gandhinagar.”

4. In the judgment dated 31.05.1985 passed in Suit No.594A/1982 the award was taken on record and made a Rule of the Court and the said order passed in the said suit reads as under:

“This suit coming on this day for final disposal before this Court in the presence of counsel for the parties as aforesaid, it is ordered that the objections (I.A. No. 2830/1982) filed by respond













































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top