K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, A.K.SIKRI
B. S. N. L. – Appellant
Versus
Bhurumal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
A.K. Sikri, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. For deciding this appeal, the seminal facts, which are required a mention are recapitulated below:
3. The respondent herein raised an industrial dispute alleging his wrongful termination, by approaching the Assistant Labour Commissioner, Faridabad in the year 2000. He claimed that he was working as a Lineman on daily wages with the Sonipat Telephone Department, BSNL at Saidpur Exchange and was not paid his wages for the period from October 2001 till April 2002. He further stated that while working he got an electrical shock and because of this accident he was hospitalized. However, he was not allowed to resume his duty which amounted to wrongful termination. Conciliation Proceedings commenced after notice was sent to the appellant. Defence of the appellant was that the respondent never worked with the appellant. It was pleaded that there was an agreement dated 18.1.2002 entered into between appellant and M/s. Haryana Securities/Services (Regd) for supply of securities personnel to SSA, Sonipat. The appellant stated that the respondent may have worked as a contract employee with the said contractor and deployed at the establishment of t
Incharge Officer &Anr.vs. Shankar Shetty
Jagbir Singh v. Haryana State AgricultureMktg..Board
U.P.State Brassware Corpn.Ltd. V. UdayNarainPandey
Uttaranchal Forest Development Corpn. V. M.C. Joshi
Sita Ram v.MotiLal Nehru Farmers Training Institute
Jaipur Development Authority v. Ramsahai
Mahboob Deepak v.NagarPanchyat, Gajraula
Telegraph Deptt.V. SantoshKumar Seal
Telecom District Manager v. Keshab Deb
A.Umarani v. Registrar, Coop.Societies
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.