B.S.CHAUHAN, J.CHELAMESWAR
Ram Kishan – Appellant
Versus
Tarun Bajaj – Respondent
Judgment :-
Dr. B.S. Chauhan, J.
1. This Contempt Petition has been filed by the applicant that the respondents, who are alleged contemnors herein, have wilfully violated the judgment and order dated 5.7.2012 passed by this Court in C.A. No. 4985 of 2012 as the respondents failed to pay all consequential benefits of service as directed and thus, the respondents should be dealt with under the provisions of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as `the Act’) and further, to direct the contemnors to implement the order in its true spirit and fix his pension according to the post of Joint Secretary (Legal) and provide all its retirement benefits.
2. Facts and circumstances of this petition are that the applicant while working as an Under Secretary (Legal), Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as `Nigam’) was compulsorily retired vide an order dated 19.11.2003. Aggrieved, he challenged the said order by filing Writ Petition No. 3954 of 2004 and during its pendency, he reached the age of superannuation on 28.2.2006. The said writ petition was allowed by the learned Single Judge vide judgment and order dated 10.2.2009 quashing the impugned order da
Anil Ratan Sarkar v. Hirak Ghosh
Sahdeo alias Sahdeo Singh v. State of U.P.
National Fertilizers Ltd. v. Tuncay Alankus
S. Sundaram Pillai v. V.R. Pattabiraman
Rakapalli Raja Rama Gopala Rao v. Naragani Govinda Sehararao
Niaz Mohammad v. State of Haryana
Chordia Automobiles v. S. Moosa
M/s. Ashok Paper Kamgar Union v. Dharam Godha
State of Orissa v. Md. Illiyas
Uniworth Textiles Ltd. v. CCE, Raipur
Lt. Col. K.D. Gupta v. Union of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.