SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(SC) 936

ALTAMAS KABIR, S.S.NIJJAR
Ram Jethmalani – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Goolam E. Vahanvati, AG, Mr. H.P. Raval, ASG, Mr. J.S. Attri and Mr. Anil B. Divan, Senior Advocate, Ms. Lata Krishnamurthy, Mr. R.N. Karanjawala, Ms. Manik Karanjawala, Mr. Sandeep Kapur, Mr. Ravi Sharma, Mr. Pranav Deish, Mr. S. Patnaik, Mr. Arjun Mahajan (for M/s Karanjawala & Co.), Ms. Meenakshi Arora and Mr. Samir Ali Khan, Mr. Devadatt Kamath, Mr. Anoopam N. Prasad, Ms. Naila Jung, Mr. Nishanth Patil, Mr. Arijit Prasad, Mr. T.A. Khan, Mr. B.V. Balaram Das, Mr. Ashok Kumar Gupta, Mr. H.S. Parihar, Ms. Asha Gopalan Nair (AOR), M/s. K.J. John & Co., Ms. Arti Singh, Mr. Pratap Venugopal, Ms. Namrata Sood, Ms. Sadhna Sandhu, Mrs. Anil Katiyar, Mrs. Anuradha Mutatkar, Ms. Anagha S. Desai, Mr. Santosh Paul, Mr. Arvind Gupta, Mr. Rajiv Nanda and Ms. Sushma Suri, Advocates, with them, for the appearing parties.

JUDGMENT

ALTAMAS KABIR, J.

1. Writ Petition (Civil) No.176 of 2009 was filed by Shri Ram Jethmalani and five others against the Union of India, the Reserve Bank of India, the Securities Exchange Board of India, the Director, Directorate of Enforcement and the Chairman, Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, against the purported inaction of the Government to arrange for recovery of large sums of money deposited by Indian citizens in foreign banks and, in particular, in Swiss Banks. In that context the Petitioners, inter alia, prayed for the following reliefs:

'(a) that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue notice to all the Respondents calling upon them to disclose all the facts which have come to their knowledge so far pertaining to the aforementioned issues and the steps taken by them in this regard;

(b) to make orders from time to time to ensure that the outcome of the investigations are not suppressed or even unduly delayed;

(c) the suitable directions be issued to the Respondent No.1 to apply to the Foreign Banks, more particularly the UBS Bank for freezing the amounts in the said foreign banks, particularly, the UBS





















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top