A.K.SIKRI, N.V.RAMANA
UNION OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
N. S. RATHNAM – Respondent
JUDGMENT
A.K. SIKRI, J.
The respondent herein impugned the validity of Notifications Nos.102/87-CE and 103/87-CE, both dated 27.03.1987, whereby whole of the duty of excise was exempted in respect of iron and steel scrap obtained by breaking the ship subject to the condition that customs duty should have been levied at the rate of Rs.1400/-per Light Displacement Tonnage (LDT). With the stipulation of such a condition, giving the exemption of payment of excise duty only to those who had paid customs duty at Rs.1400/-per LDT, another class of persons who also paid custom duty under Section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, albeit at a lesser rate, was excluded. The respondent who belonged to excluded category, had challenged the said Notification as arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution. Though the learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petition, the Division Bench in appeal has accepted the aforesaid plea of the respondent and vide judgment dated 18.08.2003 held that the second category of persons shall also be entitled to the benefit of this Notification. It is this judgment which is impugned by the Union of India and is the subject matter of the instant appea
Kasinka Trading v. Union of India
Government of India v. Dhanalakshmi Paper and Board Mills, Tiruchirappalli
Thermax Private Limited v. Collector of Customs (Bombay)
Shrijee Sales Corporation v. Union of India
Reliance Industries Ltd. v. Pravinbhai Jasbhai Patel
Aashirwad Films v. Union of India
Sube Singh v. State of Haryana
Secretary to Govt. of Madras v. P.R. Sriramulu
State of U.P. v. Deepak Fertilizers & Petrochemical Corporation Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.