A.K.SIKRI, ASHOK BHUSHAN
SRD NUTRIENTS PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE GUWAHATI – Respondent
JUDGMENT
A.K. SIKRI, J.
Leave granted in the special leave petitions.
2) In order to encourage the business community to set up manufacturing units in industrially backward areas like the North-Eastern States, viz. Assam, Jammu & Kashmir, Meghalaya, Tripura, Mizoram, Manipur, Nagaland, Arunachal Pradesh as well as Sikkim, notifications were issued by the Excise Department, Government of India, exempting goods specified in the First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (other than those mentioned in the annexure to these notifications) from payment of excise duty in respect of the goods manufactured and cleared from units located in the aforesaid States. The methodology which was adopted and prescribed in these notifications was that the manufacturer was initially supposed to pay the excise duty leviable on such goods at the time of clearance as per the Tariff Act and thereafter claim the refund thereof. It was also mentioned in these notifications that exemption contained therein shall be available subject to the condition that the manufacturer first utilises whole of the CENVAT credit available to him on the last date of the month under consideration for payment of duty
Cyrus Surfactants Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Jammu
Commissioner of Central Excise, Jammu v. Jindal Drugs Ltd
Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Asstt.) Dharwar v. Dharmendra Trading Company
R.S. Joshi, Sales Tax Officer, Gujarat v. Ajit Mills Limited
Collector of Central Excise, Patna v. Tata Engineering and Locomotive Co.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.