ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, VINEET SARAN
Vidya Drolia – Appellant
Versus
Durga Trading Corporation – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
R.F. NARIMAN, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. The facts, in this appeal, are as follows:
(i) A Tenancy Agreement was entered into between the landlord’s predecessor-in-title (Shree Bajrang Land & Trading Company) and the appellants/tenant on 02.02.2006 in respect of certain godowns and other structures.
(ii) The maximum period of tenancy was for 10 years. The initial period was 5 years, with an option for renewal for another 5 years with a 10% enhancement in the rent.
(iii) It was agreed that the tenant should pay the agreed rent of Rs. 12,985/- per month. It was also agreed that upon expiry or earlier determination of the lease, the tenant shall deliver vacant and peaceful possession of the premises. Clause 23 of the aforesaid Agreement stated as follows:
“23. That in case of any disputes, differences and/or claims arising by and between the parties out of this agreement and/or in respect to the subject matter of this agreement, the same shall be referred to the Arbitral Tribunal consisting of three arbitrators, out of which one arbitrator shall be appointed by the party of the first part, one by the party of the other part collectively and the Presiding Arbitrator shall be appointed
Himangni Enterprises v. Kamaljeet Singh Ahluwalia
Duro Felguera, S.A. v. Gangavaram Port Ltd.
Praduman Kumar v. Virendra Goyal (Dead) by LRs.
Booz Allen and Hamilton Inc. v. SBI Home Finance Limited
Natraj Studios (P) Ltd. v. Navrang Studios
Deccan Merchants Co-operative Bank Ltd. v. M/s Dalichand Jugraj Jain
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.