SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, INDIRA BANERJEE
Satyan – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Commissioner – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.
1. The State Government of Karnataka granted lands to members of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe community, free of charge, to assist in their economic empowerment and to provide them with opportunity for self-employment through agriculture, the lands granted being agricultural lands. In the early 1980s, the private respondents No.3 were made beneficiaries of such grants on 12.8.1982, of lands measuring approx. two (2) acres for each of these beneficiaries, numbering eight (8), in Bannikuppe Village, Bidadi Hobli, Ramanagaram, Bangalore Rural District. These grants came with certain restrictions, especially qua transfer, so that the very objective with which the lands have been allotted is not defeated. We are concerned, in the present appeals, with the transfer of these lands to the appellant by all the eight (8) beneficiaries, in August and September, 1997, which were sought to be annulled by the orders of the competent authority, under The Karnataka Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prohibition of Transfer of Certain Lands) Act, 1978 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘said Act’).
2. The grants made are on similar terms, and for the prese
Manchegowda v. State of Karnataka
Ibrahimpatnam Taluk Vyavasaya Coolie Sangham v. K. Suresh Reddy
Situ Sahu v. State of Jharkhand
Chhedi Lal Yadav v. Hari Kishore Yadav (Dead) through Legal Representatives
Harishchandra Hegde v. State of Karnataka
Amrendra Pratap Singh v. Tej Bahadur Prajapati
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.