SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(SC) 636

UDAY UMESH LALIT, VINEET SARAN
Imperia Structures Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Anil Patni – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner(s):Simranjeet Singh, Rea Dube, Gautam Talukdar, Advocates
For the Respondent(s):Respondent-in-person Priyanjali Singh, Rahul Rathore, Karunesh Kumar Shukla, Advocates

JUDGMENT :

UDAY UMESH LALIT, J.

1. These appeals [Arising out of Civil Appeal Diary No. 9796 of 2019] under Section 23 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as “the CP Act”) are directed against the common judgment and order dated 12.09.2018 passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as “the Commission”) in Consumer Case Nos. 3011, 3012, 3013, 3014, 3015, 3016, 3017, 3018, 3019 and 3020 of 2017. The relevant facts leading to the filing of the aforesaid Consumer Cases are almost identical and for the present purposes the facts leading to the filing of Consumer Case No. 3011 of 2017 are set out in detail and the appeal arising therefrom is taken as the lead appeal. The connected appeal [Arising out of Civil Appeal Diary No. 9793 of 2019] seeks to challenge the judgment and order dated 09.08.2018 passed by the Commission in Consumer Case No. 1605 of 2017 and raises same issues of fact and law. Delay in filing these appeals is condoned.

2. A Housing Scheme called “The ESFERA” in Sector 13C, Gurgaon, Haryana


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top