SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(SC) 1618

R.C.LAHOTI, ASHOK BHAN
Har Vilas – Appellant
Versus
Mahendra Nath – Respondent


ORDER :

R.C. Lahoti and Ashok Bhan, JJ. - Mahendra Nath, respondent No.1, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement of sale dated 17.9.1974, impleading respondent Nos.2 to 5 as defendants. The suit, registered as Original Suit No.72 of 1975 in the Court of the Civil Judge, Mainpur, was decreed on 4.3.1978. The decree is for specific performance of the agreement dated 17.9.1974 and for possession over the land in suit. This decree has achieved a finality.

2. The decree was put to execution. When the warrant for delivery of possession was sought to be executed, the appellant offered resistance claiming to be in possession of the suit property and not bound by the decree. He preferred a petition purporting to be under Rules 35 and 97 of the Order 21 of the Code of Civil Procedure before the Executing Court. The objection was dismissed as not maintainable. The appellant preferred a revision to the High Court which too has been dismissed following a Full Bench decision of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh in Smt.Usha Jain & Ors. v. Manmohan Bajaj, AIR 1980 MP 146 : 1980 MPLJ 429 (FB).

3. The view taken by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh in the above-noted decision is that durin

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top