ASHOK BHUSHAN, R. SUBHASH REDDY, M. R. SHAH
N. Vijayakumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
R. Subhash Reddy, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. The sole accused in Special Calendar Case No.49 of 2011 on the file of Special Court for Trial of Prevention of Corruption Act Cases, Madurai, has filed these appeals, aggrieved by the conviction recorded vide judgment dated 28.08.2020 and 22.09.2020 and sentence imposed vide order dated 15.09.2020 and 29.09.2020 by the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (for short, ‘the Act’).
3. The appellant-accused was working as Sanitary Inspector in 8th Ward of Madurai Municipal Corporation. He was charge-sheeted for the offence under Sections 7, 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the Act alleging that he demanded an amount of Rs.500/and a cell phone as illegal gratification from PW-2 (Thiru. D. Gopal), who was working as Supervisor in a Voluntary Service Organisation called Neat And Clean Service Squad (NACSS), which was given sanitation work on contract basis in Ward No.8 of Madurai Corporation. It was the case of the prosecution that to send his report for extension of work beyond the period of March 2003, when PW-2 has approached him on 09th and 10th of Oct
Murugesan & Ors. v. State through Inspector of Police (2012) 10 SCC 383 – Relied [Para 6]
Anil Rai etc. v. State of Bihar (2001) 7 SCC 318 – Referred [Para 6]
Chandrappa & Ors. v. State of Karnataka (2007) 4 SCC 415 – Relied [Para 10]
Hakeem Khan & Ors. v. State of Madhya Pradesh
C.M. Girish Babu v. CBI, Cochin
B. Jayaraj v. State of Andhra Pradesh (2014) 13 SCC 55 – Relied [Para 12]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.