SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Kar) 1508

V. SRISHANANDA
B. S. Angadi – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Anil Kale, Advocate, Shankar Hegde, Advocate

JUDGMENT/ORDER

1. Heard Sri Shankar Hegde, learned counsel appearing for the appellants and Sri Anil Kale, learned Special Public Prosecutor appearing for respondent-Lokayukta.

2. The present appeal is preferred against the judgment of conviction dtd. 23/7/2011 passed in Spl.SVC.CC.No.2/2005 by the District and Sessions Judge, Gadag, ("trial Court" for short), whereby the appellant-accused were convicted for the offence punishable under Ss. 7, 13(1)(d) read with Sec. 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 ("PC Act" for short).

3. Accused No.1 was sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one year and fine of Rs.5, 000.00 for the offence punishable under Sec. 7 of PC Act in default to pay fine, to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one month and accuse No.1 was also sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one year and fine of Rs.2, 000.00 for the offence punishable under Sec. 13(1)(d) read with Sec. 13(2) of PC Act, in default to pay the said fine, to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of two months.

4. Accused No.2 is sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for the period of one year and to pay a fine of Rs.5, 000.00 for the o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top