M. Nageswara Reddy vs State of Andhra Pradesh

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(SC) 183

M. R. SHAH, B. V. NAGARATHNA
M. Nageswara Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant(s) : Mr. A.Sirajudeen .Sr.Adv. Mr. Parnam Prabhakar, Adv. Mr. D. Srinivas, Adv. Mr. R.Ravi, Adv Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, AOR Mr. Mahfooz A. Nazki, AOR Mr. Polanki Gowtham, Adv Mr. Shaik Mohamad Haneef, Adv Mr. T. Vijaya Bhaskar Reddy, Adv Mr. K. V. Girish Chowdary, Adv Ms. Rajeswari Mukherjee, Adv
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Guntur Prabhakar, AOR Mr. D.Ramakrishna Reddy, Adv. Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR Mr. M. A. Chinnasamy, AOR C.Rubavathi, Adv. M.Veeraragavan, Adv. C.Raghavendren Adv. V.Senthil Kumar, Adv P.Rajaram, Adv. K.Ethiraj, Adv. Meikandan, Adv. Mr. Goli Ramakrishna,Adv. Mr. Sumanth Nookala, AOR

JUDGMENT :

M.R. SHAH, J.

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned common judgment and order dated 21.02.2018 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad for the State of Telangana and the State of Andhra Pradesh in Criminal Appeal No. 611/2011 and Criminal Appeal No. 659/2011, by which the High Court has allowed Criminal Appeal No. 611/2011 preferred by original accused Nos. 1 to 3 (respondent Nos. 2 to 4 herein in Criminal Appeal No. 72 of 2022) and has acquitted original accused Nos. 1 to 3 and by which the High Court has dismissed Criminal Appeal No. 659/2011 preferred by the original complainant-appellant in Criminal Appeal No. 73/2022, challenging the judgment and order passed by the learned trial Court acquitting the rest of the accused, i.e. accused Nos. 4 to 11, the original complainant has preferred the present appeals bearing Criminal Appeal Nos. 72-73/2022.

1.1 Against the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court acquitting original accused Nos. 1 to 3, the State has also preferred a separate appeal being Criminal Appeal No. 74 of 2022.

2. As per the case of the prosecution, on 18.01.2007 at about 8:30 p.m. all the accused formed an unlawfu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2022 Supreme(SC) 183

M. R. SHAH, B. V. NAGARATHNAM. Nageswara Reddy – AppellantVersusState of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent

M. R. SHAH, B. V. NAGARATHNA
M. Nageswara Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent