B. R. GAVAI, B. V. NAGARATHNA
T. P. Gopalakrishnan – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
NAGARATHNA, J.
1. These Criminal Appeals have been filed assailing the impugned judgment and order dated 13.06.2016 passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam in Criminal Appeal Nos. 947 and 948 of 2009 by which the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 27.04.2009 passed in C.C. No.24 and 25 of 2003 by the Court of the Enquiry Commissioner and Special Judge, Kozhikode (‘Trial Court’, for the sake of convenience) has been upheld by dismissing the aforesaid appeals and consequently confirming the conviction of the appellant herein.
2. For the sake of convenience, the parties shall be referred to as per their rank before the Trial Court.
3. The Trial Court vide its judgment and order dated 27.04.2009 in both the aforesaid cases convicted the appellant herein-accused for offences under Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(c) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (‘the Act’, for short) and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years and to pay a fine of Rupees Two Thousand and in default thereof, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months. The accused was further convicted for the offence under Section 409 of the Indian Penal Code, 186
Vijayalakshmi vs. Vasudevan (1994) 4 SCC 656 – Relied [Para 23]
Thakur Ram vs. State of Bihar AIR 1966 SC 911 – Relied [Para 25]
S.A. Venkataraman vs. Union of India AIR 1954 SC 375 – Relied [Para 26]
Maqbool Hussain vs. State of Bombay AIR 1953 SC 325 – Relied [Para 26]
State (N.C.T. of Delhi) vs. Navjot Sandhu (2005) 11 SCC 600 – Relied [Para 28]
Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India AIR 1978 SC 597 – Relied [Para 29]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.