Smriti Debbarma (Dead) Through Legal Representative vs Prabha Ranjan Debbarma

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(SC) 9

SANJIV KHANNA, J. K. MAHESHWARI
Smriti Debbarma (Dead) Through Legal Representative – Appellant
Versus
Prabha Ranjan Debbarma – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant(s) : Mr. Rauf Rahim, AOR Mr. Ali Asghar Rahim, Adv.
For the Respondent(s) Dr. Kedar Nath Tripathy, AOR Mr. Jitendra Mahapatra, Adv. Mr. A.K. Yadav, Adv. Mr. Priyam Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Apratim Bhattacharya, Adv. Dr. P. V. Saravanaraja, AOR Mr. P. Veerappan, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

SANJIV KHANNA, J.

On 19.06.1986, Smriti Debbarma, as an attorney and on behalf of Maharani Chandratara Devi, had filed Title Suit No. 66 of 1986, inter alia praying for declaration that Maharani Chandratara Devi is the owner of the property known as ‘Khosh Mahal’, described in Schedule ‘A’ to the original plaint, as under:

	“SCHEDULE-A.
Old Dar Tashkishi Taluk No. 178 (now Agartala Town Sheet No. 3), Khatian No. 4882, Dag Nos. 13142, 13144, 13176/26261 and 13144/51733, commonly known as “Khosh Mahal”, within this land measuring One Kani five Gandas two karas, three kranta and ten dhurs only.”

Other reliefs included a declaration that any transfer/conveyance for and on behalf of the plaintiff made by late Bikramendra Kishore Debbarma¹[Alias “Bidurkarta”.] and his legal representatives, impleaded as defendant nos. 1 to 7 to the civil suit, should be declared illegal and void, and that the defendants and their agents should be restrained from entering, selling or alienating the Schedule ‘A’ property. In addition, the plaintiff had pray

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 Supreme(SC) 9

SANJIV KHANNA, J. K. MAHESHWARISmriti Debbarma (Dead) Through Legal Representative – AppellantVersusPrabha Ranjan Debbarma – Respondent

Cases Referred (7)

SANJIV KHANNA, J. K. MAHESHWARI
Smriti Debbarma (Dead) Through Legal Representative – Appellant
Versus
Prabha Ranjan Debbarma – Respondent