ABHAY S. OKA, RAJESH BINDAL
Neeraj Dutta – Appellant
Versus
State (Govt. of N. C. T. of Delhi) – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Abhay S. Oka, J.
FACTUAL ASPECTS
1. The appellant was convicted by the Special Judge, Delhi for the offences punishable under Section 7 and clauses (i) and (ii) of Section 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (for short, ‘the PC Act’). The co-accused, Mr. Yogesh Kumar, was convicted by the Special Judge for the offence punishable under Section 12 of the PC Act. The co-accused was acquitted by the High Court. The appellant was sentenced to undergo a rigorous imprisonment for a period of three years and to pay a fine of Rs.15,000/- for the offence punishable under sub-section (2) of Section 13 of the PC Act. For the offence punishable under Section 7, she was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/-. Sentences in default of payment of fine were also imposed. The conviction of the appellant has been upheld by the High Court by the impugned judgment.
2. The complainant – Mr. Ravijit Singh died before the trial commenced. In fact, PW7, the Investigation Officer, deposed that the complainant was murdered. In his complaint, the complainant stated that he was doing business of sale and purchase o
M. Narsinga Rao v. State of A.P. 2001 (1) SCC 691 [Para 4]
P. Satyanarayana Murthy v. District Inspector of Police
N. Vijayakumar v. State of Tamil Nadu 2021 (3) SCC 687 [Para 11]
M. Narsinga Rao v. State of A.P. 2001 (1) SCC 691 [Para 4] – Relied.
N. Vijayakumar v. State of Tamil Nadu 2021 (3) SCC 687 [Para 11] – Relied.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.