SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(SC) 995

ABHAY S. OKA, SANJAY KAROL
H. D. Sundara – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant(s) : Mr. Prakash Ranjan Nayak, AOR
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Shubhranshu Padhi, AOR

JUDGMENT :

ABHAY S. OKA, J.

1. This is an appeal preferred by the accused challenging the impugned judgment of the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore by which the order of their acquittal, passed by the Sessions Court, was overturned. The appellants were convicted for the offences punishable under Part I of Section 304 and Section 324 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short ‘IPC’). They were sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years and pay a fine of Rs. 5,000/-.

FACTUAL ASPECTS

2. We may refer to a few factual aspects of the case. PW-1 (Jagadeesha) is the complainant. The complainant’s family had property in the village Hebbale. The appellant no. 1-accused no. 1-Mariyappa is PW-1’s uncle, with whom PW-1’s family was having a dispute over water. Manjunatha and Shivarama are the brothers of PW-1, who are the victims of the offence. On 29th August 1999, both entered the village Hebbale to engage labourers for plucking ginger. PW-1 followed them. On the road to the village, he found that PW-2 (Sundara) and PW-6 (Ravi) were sitting on a culvert. When he was talking to them, they heard the hue and cry from the village, and therefore, they rushed


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top