Priya Indoria vs State Of Karnataka And Ors. Etc.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(SC) 1164

B. V. NAGARATHNA, UJJAL BHUYAN
Priya Indoria – Appellant
Versus
State Of Karnataka And Ors. Etc. – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Rishi Matoliya, AOR Mr. H. D. Thanvi, Adv. Mr. Nikhil Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Achal Singh Bule, Adv. Mr. Kshitij Bikaramia, Adv.
For the Respondent(s): Mr. V. N. Raghupathy, AOR Mr. Manendra Pal Gupta, Adv. Dr. Manish Singhvi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sourav Roy, Adv. Mr. Sandeep Kumar Jha, AOR Mr. Vasudev Singh, Adv. Mr. Kaushal Sharma, Adv. Mr. Atharva Kotwal, Adv. Ms. Anjana Sharma, Adv. Mr. Sukumar, Adv. Mr. Deepak Goel, AOR Mr. Kumar Kartikay, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

NAGARATHNA, J.

Leave granted.

Bird’s Eye View of the Controversy:

2. We begin this Judgment by an illustration:

A person allegedly under intoxication beats another person with an iron rod in the State of Goa. The victim of the attack is injured. The alleged assailant travels to Rourkela, Odisha, where he is working in a factory. Meanwhile, the family of the injured registered a First Information Report (FIR) for the offence of causing grievous hurt under Section 326 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) at the Bicholim Police Station, Goa. On coming to know about the same and apprehending his arrest, the alleged assailant files an application for anticipatory bail before the District and Sessions Judge, Sundargarh, Odisha, having jurisdiction over Rourkela. Whether the alleged assailant’s application is maintainable or not? Such a question has come for consideration before this Court in the present appeal.

Facts of the case:

2.1. The present appeals have been filed by the complainant-wife, against the orders dated 07.07.2022 passed by the learned Additional City Civil and Sessio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

Judicial Analysis

None of the cases listed explicitly indicate that they have been overruled, reversed, or treated as bad law. The provided excerpt from Priya Indoria v. ... references a previous case, State of Karnataka v. S., but does not specify that the latter case has been overruled or criticized. Without explicit language indicating negative treatment or invalidation, it is not possible to categorize any case as bad law based solely on the provided information.

[Followed]

None identified: The excerpt does not mention that any case has been explicitly followed, although the reference to State of Karnataka v. S. suggests reliance or citation, but without explicit confirmation.

[Distinguished]

None identified: There is no indication that any case was distinguished in subsequent rulings.

[Criticized or Questioned]

None identified: The excerpt does not show any case being criticized or questioned.

[Reversed or Overruled]

None identified: No explicit language indicates any case has been reversed or overruled.

[Emphasis or Cited]

Priya Indoria v. ... emphasizes the prior case (State of Karnataka v. S.), but this is not treatment as bad law; rather, it shows reliance or citation.

The treatment of State of Karnataka v. S. is not fully clarified in the excerpt. It is cited as a recent past decision in the context of a sanction order under the PC Act, but there is no indication whether it has been overruled, criticized, or upheld in subsequent rulings. The lack of explicit treatment language leaves this case’s status uncertain.

The case Priya Indoria v. ... itself does not provide enough information to determine its treatment or legal standing beyond its citation of the previous case.

In summary, based on the provided snippet, there are no clear indicators of any case being overruled, reversed, or treated as bad law. The analysis is limited by the brevity and lack of detailed treatment language in the list.]

**Source :** Fuleshwar Gope VS Union Of India - Supreme Court

2023 Supreme(SC) 1164

B. V. NAGARATHNA, UJJAL BHUYANPriya Indoria – AppellantVersusState Of Karnataka And Ors. Etc. – Respondent

Judicial Analysis

B. V. NAGARATHNA, UJJAL BHUYAN
Priya Indoria – Appellant
Versus
State Of Karnataka And Ors. Etc. – Respondent