SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(SC) 489

HIMA KOHLI, AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH
Ajwar – Appellant
Versus
Waseem – Respondent


1. Leave granted.

2. The present appeals are directed against four different orders passed by the learned Single Judges of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad on applications moved by Waseem (accused No. 7),1[Respondent No. 1 in Criminal Appeal arising out of SLP(Crl.) 513 of 2023], Nazim (accused No. 8),2[Respondent No. 1 in Criminal Appeal arising out of SLP (Crl.) 2437 of 2023], Aslam (accused No. 2),3[Respondent No. 1 in Criminal Appeal arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 13404 of 2023] and Abubakar (accused No.1),4[Respondent No. 1 in Criminal Appeal arising out of SLP(Crl.) No. 16310 of 2023] under Section 439 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973,5[Cr.P.C.] for seeking regular bail in respect of Case Crime No.126 of 2020 registered at Police Station Mundali, District Meerut, Uttar Pradesh for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 352 and 504 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860,6[IPC]. Vide orders dated 07th December, 2022, 13th February, 2023 and 02nd March, 2023 and 21st March, 2023 respectively, the applications filed by Waseem, Nazim, Aslam and Abubakar were allowed by different Benches of the High Court. Aggrieved by the said orders, the appel


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top