Andhra Pradesh High Court
Judges : B.SUBHASHAN REDDY, S.S.SINHA, V.V.S.RAO
Bathina Rajya Shilpa - Appellant
Versus
NTR University of Health Sciences, Vijayawada - Respondent
Decided On : 11-13-01
Andhra Pradesh Professional Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admission into Under-graduate Professional Courses through Common Entrance Test) Rules, 1993 - Sub-rules (5), (6), (10) of Rule 7 - Andhra Pradesh Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admissions) Order, 1974 - Constitution (Thirty Second Amendment) Act, 1973 - Article 371-D - Constitution of India,1950 - Article 14 - Entrance Test - Counseling for admission – Controversy - Writ Appeals are directed against common order of single Judge - Writ petitions filed by some of students who had appeared for EAMCET - Seeking following reliefs - Declare action of respondents in granting admission in favor of candidates who have secured lesser rank than writ petitioners into year MBBS course unreserved segment of seats as bad in law and consequently direct respondents to grant admission to writ petitioner into year MBBS course - last candidate who was given admission into course said category secured rank - Grievance of appellants is that candidates belonging to reserved categories who have secured higher ranks were initially allotted against open category against payment seats in private medical colleges against their wish but subsequently they were permitted to slide down to colleges of their choice reserved quota and were even permitted to convert their seats to free seats - Held, It is clear that petitioner has not fulfilled criteria laid down of Presidential Order in order to be treated as a local candidate either in terms - True petitioner did study in State of Andhra Pradesh for a period of more ten years right from kindergarten to SSC and in spite of that she could not be treated as a local candidate in relation to any of local areas of State - Had she studied qualifying examination in State matter would have been different - Court do agree that a candidate who is a resident of State of Andhra Pradesh and who had studied in educational institutions right from kindergarten to SSC in State except for two years could not be treated as a local candidate in relation to any of local areas whereas it may be possible that a candidate who do not belong to State of Andhra Pradesh but who had studied consecutive academic years in any local area of State ending with academic year in which he appeared or first appeared for relevant qualifying examination could be regarded as a local candidate though is not a resident of State of Andhra Pradesh and studied only for four years in State - Writ appeal dismissed
( 1 ) THESE Writ Appeals are directed against the common order of the learned single Judge dated 16-7-2001 in W. P. No. 24204 of 2000 and batch whereby and whereunder the writ petitions filed by some of the students who had appeared for EAMCET-2000 (medical) seeking the following reliefs. (i) declare the action of the respondents in granting admission in favour of the candidates who have secured lesser rank than the writ petitioners into the 1st year MBBS course under the unreserved segment of seats as bad in law and consequently direct the respondents to grant admission to the writ petitioner into the 1st year MBBS course: (ii) declare the action of the respondents herein in admitting 37 reserved category candidates under payment category seats in private medical colleges and subsequently shifting them to Govt. Medical Colleges and to free seats in Private medical colleges by considering their candidature under reserved quota and consequently filling up the 37 resultant vacancies under payment category with reserved category candidates as arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India; and (iii) direct the respondents to fill up 37 resultant vacancies in payment category in open competition with the candidates who have secured higher ranks from among the open category and strictly in accordance with the merit, were dismissed.
( 2 ) THE present appeals arose out of W. P. Nos. 1111 of 2001, 25974 of 2000, 889 of 2001, 1109 of 2001, 26672 of 2000 and 4138 of 2001 respectively.
( 3 ) THOUGH the facts involved in these appeals were simple, the controversy involved, however, is of complex in nature. We may briefly note the facts as under : the appellants-petitioners herein had appeared for the Engineering Agricultural and Medical Common Entrance Test-2000 (EAMCET-2000) aspiring for admission into MBBS course for the academic year 2000-2001 and secured the ranks as detailed below : W. A. No.
Name of the rank
1222
Bathina Rajya Shilpa 1105
1226
Jilla Swapna 1112
D. Madhavi Latha 1143
1228
Abhinga Chowdary 1033
1238
Silpa 1071
1249
V. Deepthi 1118
B. Sowjanya 1214
K. Uma 1235
M. Sivarama Krishna 1266
N. Rajasekhar 1289
1297
K. Srihari 0952
the first phase of counselling for admission into the I year course conducted by the NTR University of Health Sciences, Vijayawada commenced on 8-12-2000. Approximately 1004 seats were meant for open category in the entire State. The last candidate who was given admission into the course under the said category secured rank of 1087th. The grievance of the appellants is that the candidates belonging to reserved categories who have secured higher ranks were initially allotted against open category against payment seats in private medical colleges against their wish, but, subsequently they were permitted to slide down to colleges of their choice under reserved quota and were even permitted to convert their seats to free seats. In that process, 37 candidates belonging to reserved category who were initially admitted against payments seats in private medical colleges were shifted to Government Colleges or to free seats in private medical colleges under the reserved quota. However, the resultant vacancies in the open category caused due to the vacation of the seats by the reserved category candidates were again allotted to reserved category B. C. candidates instead of open competition candidates.
( 4 ) ACCORDING to the appellants, the payment seats are a separate block and as such a reserved category candidate who secured higher rank cannot be forced to take payment seat against his wish and later be permitted to slide down to free seat in Government or private medical colleges. Such practice is contrary to sub-rules (5), (6), (10) of Rule 7 of the Andhra Pradesh Professional Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admission into Under-graduate Professional Courses through Common Entrance Test) Rules, 1993 (EAMSET Rules for short ). It was stated that once the reserved
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.