SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
A.N. RAY, C.J.I., M.H. BEG AND JASWANT SINGH, JJ.
Kumari K. S. Jayasree and another, Petitioners
Versus
The State of Kerala and another, Respondents.
Writ Petn. No. 1596 of 1975
Decided on 17-8-1976.
Advocates appeared
Mr. T. S. Krishnamoorthy Iyer, Sr. Advocate Mr. P. Kesava Pillai, Advocate with him, for Petitioners; Mr. M. M. Abdul Khadar, Advocate General for the State of Kerala, (Mr. M. K. Mustapha and Mr. Nambiar, Advocates with him), for Respondents.
BACKWARD CLASS NOT EQUATED WITH CASTE
Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 15 (4) - Selection for Admission - Admission for Candidates - Candidates Belonging to Ezhava Community - whether approach made by Commission is correct - High Court held that economic backwardness plays a part in social backwardness and in educational backwardness - Poverty or economic standards is a relevant factor. Economic backwardness contributes to social backwardness - First petitioner applied for admission to M.B.B.S. Course for 1975-76 in one of Medical College at Trivandrum in the State of Kerala. Clause 9 sub-clause (vi) in prospectus for admission provided among other things that the applicant should produce certificate of community and income in prescribed form in case of candidates belonging to communities recognised by Government as socially and educationally backward classes - Petitioner produced the certificate from the Tahsildar, showing that the total income of her family from all sources for year that she is an Ezhava – Held, whether any class of citizens is socially backward or not, it may not be irrelevant to consider the caste of said group of citizens - It is necessary to remember that special provisions is contemplated for classes of citizens and not for individual citizens as such, and so, though the caste of the group of citizens may be relevant, its importance should not be exaggerated. If the classification is based solely on caste of the citizen, it may not be logical - Evidence and material are placed before Commission. Article 15(4) which speaks of backwardness of classes of citizens indicates that the accent is on classes of citizens. Article 15 (4) also speaks of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, socially and educationally backward classes of citizens in Article 15(4) cannot be equated with castes - This Court said that the classification of backward classes based on economic conditions and occupations does not offend Article 15(4) - Petition dismissed.
JUDGMENT
RAY, C.J.I. :—The first petitioner is the minor daughter of the second petitioner. The petitioners in this writ petition challenge the Government Order dated 2 May, 1966 on the ground that it offends Article 15 (4) of the Constitution. The petitioners also ask for an order directing the respondents, viz., the State and the Principal of the Medical College at Trivandrum to allot a seat to the first petitioner.
2. The first petitioner applied for admission to the M.B.B.S. Course for 1975-76 in one of the Medical College at Trivandrum in the State of Kerala. Clause 9 sub-clause (vi) in the prospectus for admission provided among other things that the applicant should produce certificate of community and income (from all sources) in the prescribed form in the case of candidates belonging to the communities recognised by the Government as socially and educationally backward classes.
3. The petitioner produced the certificate from the Tahsildar, showing that the total income of her family from all sources is Rs. 11,752/- for the year 1975-76 and that she is an Ezhava.
4. The minimum marks prescribed for admission for candidates belonging to Ezhava community in the State is 363 in the optional subjects of Physics, Chemistry and Biology. The petitioner obtained 372 marks. The petitioner alleges that the list of candidates belonging to the Ezhava/Thiyya community selected for the seats reserved to them under Article 15 (4) of the Constitution was published on 10, October, 1975 and the first petitioner was not selected though candidates belonging to Ezhave community who had obtained less marks than the first petitioner has been selected. The petitioners further allege that the list shows that candidates Nos. 6 to 27 obtained marks ranging between 371 and 357. The Principal, Medical College sent a Memorandum to the first petitioner that, as the income exceeds Rs. 10,000/- her case cannot be considered under reservation scheme.
5. Clause 11 of the prospectus for 1975-76 for admission to M.B.B.S. Course in Medical Colleges in the State is as follows :-
"11. Selection for admission, reservation for S.Cs/S.Ts/Socially and educationally backward Class and reservation on regional basis :- Selection of candidates will be on the basis of merits as laid down in G. R. Rt. 1361/70/ Health dated 18-6-1970 and D. O. Ms. M. O. No. Health dated 216/71/Health dated 8-7-1971 and subject to the provisions contained in G.O. (P) 208/66/Edn. dated 2-5-1966 and subsequent orders of the Government regarding reservation for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes and other socially and educationally backward class, reservation for Malabar and Travancore-Cochin, area etc. The decision of the Government on matters concerning admission shall be final."
6. On 2 May, 1966 the State Government issued an order, inter alia, that only applicants who are members of families consisting of Ezhavas, whose aggregate annual income is blow Rs. 6,000/- would be entitled to admission to the seats reserved for students belonging to the socially and educationally backward class. It should be stated here that the said order of the State Government came to be issued on the consideration of the report of the Commission appointed by the State to enquire into the social and educational conditions of the people and report as to what sections of the people in the State of Kerala should be treated as socially and educationally backward classes.
7. The Commission assumed office on 14 July, 1964 and submitted its report on 31 December, 1965. The recommendation of the Commission was that only citizens who are members of families which have an aggregate income of less than Rupees 4200/- per annum and which belong to the castes and communities mentioned in Appendix VIII constitute socially and educationally backward classes for purposes of Article 15 (4).
7A. When the Government passed the order on 2 May, 1966 the Government order stated inter alia as follows:- "After the Commission collected
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.