SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Bom) 712

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
F.M. REIS & K.L. WADANE, JJ.
Keval Shrihari Ramani – Appellant
Versus
State of Goa, Through the Chief Secretary Secretariat & Others – Respondents
Writ Petition No. 248 of 2014
Decided On : 08-05-2015

Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:R.G. Ramani, Advocate
For the Respondents:R1, R2, A. N.S. Nadkarni, Advocate General with Vivek Rodrigues, Addl. Government Advocate, R4, Narayan Dattaram Govekar, R5, Abhijeet Kamat, R6, Pankaj Pai Vernekar, R7, D. B. Ambekar, R13, Sudin Usgaonkar, Vinita Palyekar, R17, Sudesh Usgaonkar, Anagha Matondkar, R23, Abhay Nachinolcar, R25, Kaif Noorani, Advocates

The judgment establishes the principle that scholarship selection processes must be transparent, reasonable, and fair, and the absence of reasons for exclusion can indicate arbitrariness warranting judicial scrutiny.

Headnote:

Scholarship - Selection Process - Right to Information Act, 2005 - [Goa Scholars 2013-14] - [Article 226 of the Constitution of India]

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, a meritorious student, challenged the selection process for the Goa Scholars 2013-14 Scholarship, alleging arbitrariness and bias. The petitioner was shortlisted but not selected, and the reasons for exclusion were not provided. The court considered the lack of transparency in the selection process and the potential harm to deserving students.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the selection process lacked transparency and reasons for exclusion were not provided, indicating arbitrariness. It acknowledged the importance of scholarships in shaping the careers of deserving students and emphasized the need for a reasonable and fair selection process.

Issues: The issues involved the arbitrariness in the selection process, lack of transparency, and potential harm to deserving students.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the lack of reasons for exclusion and absence of transparent assessment criteria in the selection process indicated arbitrariness, warranting judicial scrutiny. It emphasized the importance of a reasonable and fair selection process for scholarships.

Final Decision: The court directed the authorities to reconsider the petitioner's scholarship application in accordance with law, while refusing to set aside the selection of other candidates to avoid irretrievable injustice.

JUDGMENT :

F.M. Reis, J.

1. The above Writ Petition, inter alia, seeks for a declaration that the selection of Respondent no. 3 to 25 for the award of Goa Scholars 2013-14 Scholarship and at last the selection of Respondent nos. 3 to 14 are null and void and the amount of scholarship already disbursed be repaid to the Government. The further relief sought by the Petitioner is to direct the Respondent nos. 1 and 2 to award the Goa Scholars 2013-14 Scholarship to the Petitioner.

2. Briefly, the facts of the case are that an advertisement was issued in the Navhind Times calling for the Goa Scholars 2013-14 Scholarship online on or before 23.07.2013. The scheme was not meant to be financial assistance but would recognise the merit and merit alone. Thereafter the advertisement was amended calling for applications off line on or before 30.07.2013. The Petitioner passed his degree examination in Mechanical Engineering through BITS Pilani, K. K. Birla Campus in 2012 standing first in Mechanical Engineering and 5th among 588 students at BITS Pilani, and, as such, submitted an application for registration which was registered under no. 1335. An email was received from the Respondent no. 2 to keep himself free on 18th and 19th August 2013 for interview. A request was made by the Petitioner to re-schedule the date of the interview as the Petitioner was traveling on 18th and 19th enroute to Michigan, USA, where he had taken admission to the course of Masters in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Michigan ranking 17th in the world. Thereafter, an email was received from the Respondent no. 2 informing the Petitioner that he is shortlisted and that for the purpose of conducting an interview, a Skype ID was also emailed to the Petitioner. The interview of the Petitioner via Skype took place on 19.08.2013 and the results were declared in the newspaper on 20.08.2013 which did not include the name of the Petitioner. It is pointed out by the Petitioner that he was at serial no. 1 in the short listed candidates. Thereafter, the Petitioner through his father, made an application for information from the Respondent no. 2 under the Right to Information Act, 2005, and, on receipt of such information, the Petitioner noticed that the short listing of the candidates for the Award of the Scholarship was fraught with arbitrariness, bias and illegalities and, as such decided to file the present Writ Petition. As the Petitioner is already in USA, a Power of Attorney had to be executed in favour of his father and, accordingly, on 06.03.2014, the Petitioner executed another Power of Attorney before the Indian Consulate which was required in terms of law and the Collector adjudicated the duty on 17.03.2014 and accordingly the above Petition came to be filed.

3. Shri R. G. Ramani, learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner, has pointed out that the Petitioner was shortlisted and the selection of the candidates for the “Goa Scholars 2013-14” is fraught with arbitrariness, bias and illegalities. Learned Counsel further pointed out that there are no reasons given as to why the Petitioner has been excluded from getting such scholarship. Learned Counsel further submits that as the scheme itself provided that merit and merit alone would be recognised to get such scholarship, there was no reason for the Petitioner to be excluded from getting such scholarship as he was shortlisted at serial no. 1 in the merit list. Learned Counsel further pointed out that the Petitioner has passed out from a prestigious Institution in Goa and stood first in Mechanical Engineering at BITS Pilani and, as such, he was naturally entitled to get such scholarship. Learned Counsel has taken us through the scheme of the Goa Scholars 2013-14 to point out that the admissions had to be obtained from the first fifty institutions of the World whereas there were candidates who were not admitted in said Universities and, as such, were disqualified for such scholarship. Learned Counsel has taken











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top