SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Bom) 2213

M.S.SHAH, M.S.SONAK
Sanjeet Shukla – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff:Pradeep Sancheti, Senior Advocate, Ashish Mishra,Ameya Gokhale, Sanjeet Shukla, Party-in-Person, G.S. Godbole, Drupad S. Patil, Sumit S. Kothari, Gunratan Sadavarte, Arun D. Nagarjun, Deepak Waghmare, R.S. Apte, Senior Advocate, Sagar Ambedkar, Aparna Dhavale, Manoj Mane, Shridhar Patil, Chandrakant N. Chavan, J.G. Reddy, R.M. Kadam, Senior Advocate, Ajit Kenjale, Vishal Kanade, Rohan Kadam, Siddheshwar Biradar, S.D. Rupawate, Milind Ingole i/by Santosh Parad, Ashish Mehta, Akhlaque M.S. Solkar, Poonam Tiwari, Firoz A. Siddiqui, Ansari Tamboli, Syed Ejaz Abbas Naqvi and Shaziya Mukadam i/by Gayatri Singh.
For Respondents/Defendant:Sagheer Khan, Ravindra Adsule, Special Counsel, Geeta Mulekar, D.J. Khambata, Advocate General, Aditya Mehta, Advocate, A.B. Vagyani, GP,G.S. Rao and Geeta Shastri, AGPs.
For Intervenor: Vitthal B. Devkhile.

ORDER

1. This group of writ petitions/public interest litigations under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenge two separate Ordinances promulgated by the Governor of Maharashtra on 9 July 2014 providing for reservation of seats for admissions in aided and unaided educational institutions in the State and reservation of appointments/posts in public services under the State as under:-

(i) Separate 16% reservation for the Educationally and Socially Backward Category (ESBC) in which the Maratha community is included, (Maharashtra Ordinance No. XIII of 2014).

(ii) Separate 5% reservation for a newly created Special Backward Category-A (SBC-A) consisting of 50 sub-castes amongst Muslim community specified in the Schedule to the Ordinance, other than the categories of Muslims to whom reservation has already been given under other categories of backward classes and other backward classes, (Maharashtra Ordinance No. XIV of 2014).

Each Ordinance excludes the creamy layer, but the impugned reservations are, over and above the reservations aggregating to 52% reservations already provided by the Maharashtra State Public Services (Reservation for Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes/Denotif



















































































































































































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top