MUKUL MUDGAL, VIPIN SANGHI
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Appellant
Versus
BHAI SARDAR SINGH & SONS – Respondent
1. The aforesaid execution appeal, namely, EFA(OS) 9/2007 has been preferred by the appellant DDA to impugn the judgment dated 20th March, 2007 passed by the learned Single Judge in Execution Application No. 81/2006 in Execution Petition No. 168/2005, whereby the said application preferred by the appellant herein, who was the judgment debtor in the execution petition, has been dismissed. EA No.81/2006 had been preferred by the appellant to seek a direction that the amount of Rs.19,95,291/- be refunded to the appellant/judgment debtor.
2. So far as FAO(OS) 93/2002 is concerned, the same was disposed of by this Court on 20th April, 2004. However, the respondent/decree holder thereafter moved CM No. 5462/2007 to permit the withdrawal of the amount of Rs.12,88,770/- lying deposited in this Court. On this application, the Court on 23rd April, 2008 passed an order that the same would be considered at the time of disposal of EFA(OS) 9/2007.
3. We may give a brief factual background giving rise to the execution appeal. In relation to a construction contract between the parties, some disputes arose. They were referred to arbitration. The Arbitrator rendered an Award
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.