NAVIN CHAWLA
M. C. D. – Appellant
Versus
Ravi Kumar – Respondent
1. These petitions under section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’) have been filed by the petitioner, Municipal Corporation of Delhi challenging the arbitration award dated 10th January, 2008 passed by the Sole Arbitrator. Though the disputes between the parties arise out of two separate Work Orders and separate reference of the same were made by this Court in petitions filed under Section 11 of the Act, the Sole Arbitrator has adjudicated such disputes by way of a common award dated 10th January, 2008. The challenge to the same is also on common grounds and, therefore, both these petitions are being taken up together for adjudication.
2. The facts noted in the order are from OMP no.273/2008 only to give a brief background as to how the disputes have arisen.
3. The petitioner had awarded the work of construction of Community Toilet Complex at various sites to the respondent vide Work Order No.EE-III/SPZ/TC/2001-02/256 dated 19th October, 2001. The other relevant details of the work order are given as under:-
(a) Date of start of work : 28.10.01
(b) Date of completion : 6 months i.e. 27.4.2002
(c) Actual date completion : 26
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.