Subramanian swamy vs Union of India

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(Del) 13

D. N. PATEL, JYOTI SINGH
Subramanian swamy – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent

Advocate Appeared
For the Appellant :Dr. Subramanian Swamy, Petitioner-in-Person with Ms. Ramni Taneja, Mr. Satya Sabharwal and Mr. Vishesh Kanodia, Advocates
For the Respondent:Mr. Tushar Mehta, Solicitor General with Mr. Chetan Sharma, Additional Solicitor General, Mr. Amit Mahajan, Central Government Standing Counsel, Mr. Dhruv Pande, Ms. Amita Gupta Katragadda, Ms. Preksha Malik, Mr. Kaustubh Rai and Ms. Isha Chaudhary, Mr. Nikhil Goel, Mr. Harish Salve, Senior Advocate with Ms. Anuradha Dutt, Mr. Lynn Pereira, Ms. Feresthe Sethna, Mr. Haaris Fazili and Mr. Kunal Dutt, Advocates

JUDGMENT

D.N. PATEL, J.

1. This Public Interest Litigation has been filed seeking the following reliefs:-

“a. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction directing the Respondents Nos. 1 to 4 to quash the present Air India Disinvestment process,

b. issue a writ of Certiorari or any other writ or direction of similar nature to set aside and revoke any action or decision or grant of any further approvals/ permissions/ permits, etc. by the Respondent authorities with respect to the present Air India Disinvestment process,

c. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction directing the Respondent No. 5 to investigate into the role and functioning of the Respondents authorities and submit a detail report in the present Air India Disinvestment process exclusively to this Hon’ble Court,

d. Issue any other appropriate writ, order or direction as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.”

2. Arguments

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2022 Supreme(Del) 13

D. N. PATEL, JYOTI SINGHSubramanian swamy – AppellantVersusUnion of India – Respondent

D. N. PATEL, JYOTI SINGH
Subramanian swamy – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent