SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Gau) 260

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI (IMPHAL BENCH)
T. NANDAKUMAR SINGH, J.
All Manipur Pensioners' Association and Anr. – Appellant
Vs.
State of Manipur and Ors. – Respondent
WP(C) No. 1455 of 2000
Decided On: 24.03.2005

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared
For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: A. Nilmani Singh and A. Bimol, Advs.
For Respondents/Defendant: R.S. Reisang and C. Kamal Singh, Advs.

Differential treatment based on the date of retirement in the calculation of revised pension is arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India.

Headnote:

PENSION - Manipur Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1977 - Rule 3 of the Manipur Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1977 - Rule 54 of the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 - The judgment discusses the adoption and amendment of the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 by the State of Manipur, and the differential treatment of pre-1996 pensioners and post-1996 pensioners. The court held that differential treatment based on the date of retirement is arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India.

Fact of the Case:

The All Manipur Pensioners' Association filed a writ petition for the benefit of pre-1996 pensioners, challenging the differential treatment in the calculation of revised pension for pre-1996 pensioners and post-1996 pensioners.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the differential treatment of pre-1996 pensioners and post-1996 pensioners in the calculation of revised pension based on the date of retirement is arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India.

Issues: The issues revolved around the differential treatment of pre-1996 pensioners and post-1996 pensioners in the calculation of revised pension, and the adoption and amendment of the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 by the State of Manipur.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that differential treatment based on the date of retirement is arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. The judgment also emphasized that pension is a valuable right vested in a government servant and that denial of equality to pensioners based on a particular date is violative of Article 14.

Final Decision: The writ petition was allowed, directing the respondents to treat pre-1996 pensioners equally with post-1996 pensioners in granting the pension under the revised pension scheme. The respondents were directed to complete the necessary steps for treating pre-1996 pensioners equally with post-1996 pensioners within a period of five months from the date of receipt of the judgment and order.

JUDGMENT

T. Nandakumar Singh, J.

1. Heard Mr. A. Nilmani Singh, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. A. Bimol Singh, learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioners as well as Mr. R.S. Reisang, learned G.A. appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 and Mr. C. Kamal Singh, learned CGSC for respondent No. 3.

2. The brief facts of the petitioner-association's case are that the Association called "the All Manipur Pensioners' Association" is a society registered under the Societies Registration Act having the Regd. No. 1315/73. The petitioner association is a non-political, non-profit making and voluntary organisation, espousing the cause of old infirm pensioners. The petitioner-association filed the present writ petition for the benefit of those members who retired before 1.1.1996 (for short pre-1996 pensioners). The Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 had been adopted and enforced by the State of Manipur with effect from 1.1.1977 vide notification No. 1/3/71/H-F dated 3.3.1977 under the title of "Manipur Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1977". Again, the Governor of Manipur in exercise of his powers conferred by proviso to Article 309 of the Constitution of India makes the Rules called "The Manipur Civil Services (Pension) (Amendment) Rules, 1991" vide notification No. 5/8/87/PIC (iii) Imphal the 24th January, 1991. Under the said notification dated 24.1.1991, wherever the word/words "Union", "President", "Government", "Ministry", "Head of Department" and "Union Public Service Commission" has/have been referred to in the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972, the same shall be construed as referring to the "State of Manipur", "Governor of Manipur", "Department of the Government of Manipur", and "Head of Department declared as such by the Governor of Manipur" and "Manipur Public Service Commission" respectively except the words "Central Government" referred to in Sub-rule 13 of Rule 54 which shall continue to mean the Central Government.

3. It is pertinent to mention that the Governor of Manipur in the exercise of his powers conferred by proviso to Article 309 of the Constitution of India was pleased to make the Rules called "The Manipur Civil Services (Pension) (Amendment) Rules, 1980" under the notification No. 1/3/ 71/H -1 Imphal the 15th July, 1980. Para 2 of the said notification for the Amendment to Rule 3 reads as follows:

2. Amendment to Rule 3:

The following shall be substituted for rule 3 of the Manipur Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1977.

The Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 as amended from time to time (including the decisions taken by the Government of India) are hereby adopted with the condition that wherever the word/words. "Union", "President", "Government", "Ministry" and "Head of Deptt." has/have been referred to in the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972, the same shall be construed as referring to the "State of Manipur," Governor of Manipur", "Govt. of Manipur", "Department of the Government of Manipur" and "Head of Department declared as such by the Governor of Manipur", respectively.

4. From the bare perusal of the para 2 quoted above, it is crystal clear that while adopting the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1977, decisions taken by the Govt. of India from time to time had also been adopted by the Government of Manipur. Again, the Governor of Manipur in exercise of powers conferred by the proviso to Article 309 of the Constitution of India makes the Rules called "The Manipur Civil Services (Pension) (Amendment) Rules, 1986 vide notification No. 1/3/ 71/H-F, Imphal, the 22nd July, 1986. Para 2 of the said notification reads as follows:

2. Amendment to Rule 3:

The following shall be substituted for Rule 3 of the Manipur Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1977.

The Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1977 as amended upto date (including Government of India's decisions in regard to matters relating to pension and retirement benefits) are hereby adopted with the condition that


































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top