JUDGMENT :

P.B. SURESH KUMAR, J.

1. This writ appeal is directed against the order passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P. (C) No. 19706 of 2021 on 22.09.2021.

2. Respondents 5 and 6 in the writ petition are the appellants.

3. The order impugned in the appeal reads thus:

The petitioner will take out notice before admission by special messenger to respondents 5 and 6.

The learned Government Pleader will obtain instructions from respondents 1 to 4.

List this case for further consideration on 01.10.2021; until which time, the 4th respondent/Sub-Inspector of Police will ensure that the petitioner and his employees are afforded adequate and effective protection to carry on business in the premises in question; provided they are supported by all necessary licenses and permissions, without any let or interference from any person including respondents 5 and 6.

4. The appellants do not dispute the fact that the impugned order was one passed when the writ petition came up for admission on 22.09.2021. They also do not dispute the fact that the same is an ad interim order. On being required to submit as to the reason for challenging such an order in appeal, instead of moving the learned Judge for v