IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R.RAVI, J.
President/Delegate – Appellant
Versus
The State Co-Operative Election Commission – Respondent
W.P. (C). Nos.9447, 9793, 14211, 14710, 15557, 15591, 15660, 15762, 29611 & 32912 of 2022
Decided on : 15-06-2023
Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969 - Section 28(8), 32, 33, 23, 8A(4), 28(1K), (6), (7), (8), AB(3), AB(4), 80BB(1), 20, 21, 16B, 101 - Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 14 - Society - Administrative Committee - Vote in election - Whether any member other than a delegate contemplated in Section 28(8) of Kerala Co-operative Societies Act can vote in election to committee of 4th respondent Society – APCOS are different from other types of societies, it cannot be said that having different provisions in same enactment to govern different types of societies, violates principles of equality enshrined in Article 14 of Constitution of India. (Para 54)
Finding of the Court :
APCOS are different from other types of societies, it cannot be said that having different provisions in same enactment to govern different types of societies, violates principles of equality enshrined in Article 14 of Constitution of India - Section 16B of KCS Act creates an ineligibility for a member of an APCOS to continue as an active member in certain circumstances, which are totally unique to such a type of society - A reference to Section 101 of KCS Act is also useful in this context to understand scope of KCS Act - Section 101 gives power to Government to exempt any society or class of societies from any of provisions of Act or to apply such provisions with modifications - Such a power can be exercised in public interest by issuance of a general or special order - In case of APCOS, introduction of different provisions has been made by a legislative exercise and not by issuance of a general or special order by executive – Court hold that Section 28(8) of KCS Act is well within legislative competence of State Government, that there is no hostile discrimination in treating APCOS differently, that section is not arbitrary, and that there is no violation of Article 14 involved.
Result: Petition dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
The issues involved in all the above Writ Petitions are intrinsically connected, and they are being heard and disposed of together. W.P.(C)No.9793 of 2022 is being treated as the main case for the purpose of convenience, and the facts are narrated on that basis.
WP(C)No.9793 of 2022
RELEVANT FACTS:-
2. The petitioners are Presidents of various Anand Pattern Milk Co-operative Societies (hereinafter referred to as APCOS) under the 4th respondent Central Society. The questions posed in the Writ Petition are (i) whether any member other than a delegate contemplated in Section 28(8) of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) can vote in the election to the committee of the 4th respondent Society and (ii) whether societies granted membership/affiliation by the Administrator/
Administrative Committee can vote in the election. The Writ Petition was heard along with several other Writ Petitions relating to the election to the managing committee of the 4th respondent, and all the Writ Petitions are disposed of together.
3. The election to the 4th respondent was notified as per Ext.P1 on 04.03.2022. The election was scheduled to be held on 09.04.2022. The preliminary voters' list was published on 05.03.2022. Objections were to be submitted on or before 11.03.2022. The objections were to be considered on 14.03.2022. Of 978 Societies included in the preliminary voters' list, 58 Societies were under the control of the Administrator/ Administrative Committee appointed by the concerned Deputy Directors of Dairy Development under Section 32 or 33 of the Act, and 23 of the members were admitted/affiliated by the Administrator/Administrative Committee. The contention of the petitioners is that the 58 persons delegated by the Administrator and the 23 members who were included as members by the Administrator/Administrative Committee are not entitled to vote at the election. The contention is based on Section 28(8) of the Act, introduced by way of an amendment with effect from 12.02.2021 which says that only the President of the APCOS can be a delegate to participate in the General Body Meeting and contest the elections to the managing committee. The term of the elected committee was over on 16.02.2021, and an Administrative Committee took charge. The elected committee had taken a decision on 08.02.2021 to conduct the election, but the same was not recommended by the Department to the Election Commission. On 12.02.2021, sub-section (8) was added to Section 28, which required that the delegate of the member APCOS to attend the general body meetings and to contest the elections to the managing committee of the Regional Co-operative Milk Producers' Union shall be its President only. It is in the above background that the petitioners contend that the 58 Societies managed by Administrator or Administrative Committee that do not have a President cannot participate in the meeting or contest the election as a delegate. Regarding the 23 primary societies admitted to membership of the Central Society by the Administrative Committee, the petitioners place reliance on the decision in Jt. Registrar of Co-operative Societies V. T.A.Kuttappan reported in [2000 (2) KLT 480 (SC)] to contend that such persons cannot vote at the election.
4. The counsel for the petitioners points out that a Milk Society is one among the 15 types of Societies which are contemplated in the KCS Act. Amendments were brought in exclusively for the APCOS. These amendments were hence to be understood as overriding the other provisions of the Act, which apply to all societies. It is contended that the general provisions will have to give way to the special provisions.
5. On 16.03.2022, the Electoral Officer issued Ext.P4 order whereby the final voters’ list was published. The 58 member Societies under the Administrator/Administrative Committee were included in the list. So also, 11 APCOS were found to have deemed affiliation and hence entitled to be in
Jt. Registrar of Co-operative Societies V. T.A.Kuttappan reported in 2000 (2) KLT 480 (SC)
Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies v. T.A.Kuttappan 2000 (2) KLT 480
K.Shantaraj & Anr. v. M.L.Nagaraja & Ors. (1997) 6 SCC 37
Prakashkumar v. State Co-operative Election Commission 2014 (1) KLT 68
P.S.John v. Kerala State CRMF Ltd 1984 KLT 853
Philip v. State of Kerala 2008 (2) KLT 555
Raghavan Nair v. Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies 1998 (2) KLT 1068
State (NCT of Delhi) v. Sanjay 2014 (9) SCC 772
Rib Tapes (India)(P) Ltd & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors. 1986 KHC 665 = 1986 (4) SCC 185
Vishal N.Kalsaria v. Bank of India 2016 (1) KHC 330 = 2016(3) SCC 762
Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation v. GTL Infrastructure Limited & Ors. 2016 KHC 6877 = 2017 (3)SCC 545
Atam Prakash v. State of Haryana & Ors. 1986 KHC 745 = (1986) 2 SCC 249
Ram Narain Sons Ltd. v. Asstt. CST AIR 1955 SC 765
State of Kerala & Ors. v. A.Beevi Kannu 2014 (4) KHC 673 (FB)
Sanjay Ramdas Patil v. Sanjay & Ors. 2021 (10) SCC 306
Chief Justice of Andhra Pradesh v. L.V.A.Dixitulu AIR 1979 SC 193
Binoy Viswam v. Union of India (2017) 7 SCC 59
State of M.P. v. Rakesh Kohli (2012) 6 SCC 312
State of A.P. v. McDowell & Co. (1996) 3 SCC 709.
Mohd. Hanif Quareshi v. State of Bihar AIR 1958 SC 731
Mahant Moti Das v. S.P. Sahi AIR 1959 SC 942
Hamdard Dawakhana v. Union of India AIR 1960 SC 554
Section 16B of KCS Act creates an ineligibility for a member of an APCOS to continue as an active member in certain circumstances, which are totally unique to such a type of society.
The right to contest elections is a statutory right, not a fundamental right, and arbitrary term restrictions violate the autonomy of co-operative societies.
When a right is created by a statute, which itself prescribes the remedy or procedure for enforcing the right or liability, resort must be had to that particular statutory remedy before invoking the ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the violation of the petitioner's fundamental right to participate in the election process due to the inconsistency between Bye-law 24(viii) and Se....
Sub-rules (4) and (4A) would specifically make it clear that what was being sought to be explained by explanation was with regard to right to be included in a voters list and therefore, eligibility t....
The general body of a co-operative society possesses an inherent democratic right to remove a managing committee through a no-confidence motion. Such a procedure, when codified in statutory rules, is....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.