SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Raj) 477

J.C.VERMA
SURENDRA BHATIA – Appellant
Versus
PUNAM BHATIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
DALIP SINGH, NAINA SARAF, R.P.GARG

Judgment


J. C. VERMA

( 1 ) S. B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 245/2000 has been filed against the judgment and decree dated 6-12-1999 passed by the District Judge, Jaipur city, Jaipur by Surendra Bhatia - defendant. In the suit filed by Smt. Poonam Bhatia by which decree he had allowed the application of the respondent plaintiff of grant of succession certificate; whereas Appeal No. (defect) 219/2000 is also directed against the same judgment and decree dated 6-12-1999 by Smt. Swarn Anand D/o Shri Chunni Lal Bhatia who was one of the defendant in the suit filed by Smt. Poonam.

( 2 ) THE respondent-plaintiff Smt. Poonam Bhatia w/o Late Sudershan Bhatia and Kumari Smita Bhatia D/o Late Sudershan Bhatia R/o 7, Pradhan Marg, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur had filed a suit for succession certificate against Surendra Bhatia, Smt. Swam Anand sons and daughters of Shri Chunni Lal Bhatia and Kumari Smita Bhatia wife of Shri K. B. Bhatia.

( 3 ) SUIT was filed u/s. 372 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 stating therein in the application that the deceased Sudershan Bhatia, husband of Smt. Poonam Bhatia and father of Kumari Smita Bhatia had property at Jaipur and Delhi. The deceased Sudershan Bhatia died on

































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top