CHANDER BHUSAN BAROWALIA
Kangru Ram – Appellant
Versus
Sriram – Respondent
CHANDER BHUSAN BAROWALIA, J.
1. The present petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is maintained by the petitioner/plaintiff (hereinafter to be called as “the plaintiff”), for quashing the order dated 19.05.2017, passed by learned Civil Judge (Jr. Div.), Court No. 4, Hamirpur, H.P., in CMA No. 375 of 2013, Civil Suit No. 120 of 2012, whereby an application, under Order 26, Rule 9, read with Section 151 CPC, for appointment of the Local Commissioner, was dismissed.
2. Briefly stating facts giving rise to the present petition are that the plaintiff filed an application before the leaned Court below, under Order 26, Rule 9, read with Section 151 CPC, wherein he alleged that the respondent/defendant is adjoining owner, having Khasra No. 208 and he dug the suit land and raised construction in the shape of steps and also blocked the drain/challa of the plaintiff. It has been further averred in the application that since main dispute inter se the parties is boundary dispute, the appointment of Local Commissioner is necessary as it will enable the Court to give specific findings. Lastly, the plaintiff prayed that the present application may be allowed and Local C
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.