SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, NAVNEET KUMAR
Doman Mahto, son of Late Kartik Mahto – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.
1. The instant intra-court appeal, preferred under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent, is directed against the order/judgment dated 11.12.2018 passed by learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P.(C) No.7856 of 2011 whereby and whereunder the order passed by the revenue authorities have been refused to be interfered with by dismissing the writ petition.
2. Brief facts of the case as per the pleadings made in the writ proceeding, which are required to be enumerated herein, read as under :-
3. The entire village of Banta Hazam, Police Station Silli was put in auction certificate in the year 1893 on failure of the raiyat to pay rent to the then landlord. The said village was purchased by one Brajeshwar Sahay and Ramyad Sahu. Accordingly, Khewat No. 3/1 and 3/2 were prepared in their name respectively. In course of survey and settlement operation in the year 1935 Khatian was prepared in joint ownership with respect to Khata No. 842 of village Banta Hazam.
4. It is stated that Rameshwar Sahu and Tapeshwar Sahu, both sons of late Ramyad Sahu were the Zamindar of village Banta-Hazam, as would be evident from the Zamindari rent receipt issued by them. The ex-inte
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.