1. The first petitioner is the management and the second petitioner is its Managing Director. In this Writ Petition, they have come forward to challenge a common order passed by the 1st respondent Labour Court, Chennai in C.P.Nos.201 to 230, 246 to 248, 255, 263 an 326 of 2006 dated 30.4.2009. By the common order, the Labour Court computed the amount due to each of the contesting respondents 2 to 37 specifying those amounts in para 12 of the impugned order. Aggrieved by the direction to pay certain amounts, the Writ Petition came to be filed.

2. The Writ Petition was admitted on 6.8.2010. Interim stay was granted on the same day for a limited period. Subsequently, when the contesting respondents filed vacate stay application in M.P.No.2 of 2010, the matter was not disposed of. But, once again interim stay was extended for two more weeks and thereafter there was no further extension. It is under the said circumstances, the Writ Petition came to be posted for final disposal.

3. Heard the arguments of Mr.S.Jayarajaman, learned counsel appearing for Mr.H.Balaji, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.S.Kumarasamy, learned counsel appearing for the respondents 2 to 37.

4. I