G.M.AKBAR ALI
Nachammal – Appellant
Versus
S. Murugesan – Respondent
2. By a common judgment dated 20.1.2010 in S.A.Nos.780 and 781 of 2004, this Court dismissed the second appeals. The appellant has preferred the present review petitions on the following grounds,:
i) This court having accepted that the suit property is a Grama natham and that the occupier of the Grama natham becomes the owner of the property ought to have allowed the appeals thereby confirming the title to the appellants;
ii) This court having found that one Karuppa Naidu and thereafter, the appellants were in long possession of the suit property, ought to have held that the appellant's predecessor was the first occupier of Grama natham;
iii) The Court ought to have considered that the appellants have established possessory title.
3. Before adverting to the above grounds and the maintainability of the present review petition, let us see the brief facts of the case which is as follows:
The Review petitioner/appellants are the plaintiffs in O.S.No.309 of 1994 and the defendants in O.S.No.641 of 1995. They have filed the suit for declaration
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.