SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Ori) 214

ARIJIT PASAYAT, P.C.NAIK
PADMANAV DEHURY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ORISSA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.M.SENAPATI

PASAYAT, J.

( 1 ) NOMINATION of Ramachandra Mohapatra as President of the Governing Body of Ramamani Mahavidyalaya, Kantabad in the district of Khurda is under challenge in this writ application. Said nomination was made by the Director of Higher Education, Orissa, Bhubaneswar under Rule 27 (wrongly stated to be Section 27 in Annexure-1) of the Orissa Education (Establishment, Recognition, Management of Private Junior Colleges/higher Secondary Schools) Rules, 1991 (in short, the 'rules' ). The institution is an aided educational institution within the meaning of Section 3 (b) of the Orissa Education Act, 1969 (in short, the 'act' ).

( 2 ) MAIN plank of challenge is that said Rama Chandra Mohapatra is not an eminent educationist which is a sine qua non for such nomination. It is highlighted that originally by order dated 4-9-1997 (Annexure-1) the Sub-Collector, Khurda was nominated by the Government as the President of the Governing Body. Subsequently by order dated 21-11-1997 (Annexure 2), the impugned order nomination of Rama Chandra was approved by the Director. The Sub-Collector was approved as the Member of the Governing Body.

( 3 ) A brief history of the power relating to s























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top