Kuldip Singh, J.

CM No. 924-LPA-2018

1. For the reasons mentioned in the application the same is allowed and delay in filing the appeal stands condoned.

Main case

2. By this common judgment, we shall dispose of LPA Nos.362, 405 to 409, 412 to 418, 421, 425, 427, 434 to 437, 439, 442, 443, 470, 517, 571, 572, 591, 613, 918 of 2018.

3. Haryana Staff Selection Commission has preferred these Intra Court Appeals against judgment dated 23.10.2017 passed by a Single Bench of this Court, in which, the following order was passed:-

12. Hence, in view of what has been stated hereinabove, as also as per the ratio of the Division Bench judgment in CWP no. 9533 of 2001, “Ankita Beniwal vs. Haryana Public Service Commission”, these petitions are allowed and the respondent Commission is directed to interview the petitioners if they otherwise come within the zone of selection as per the marks obtained by the last candidate, in each category in which the petitioners have applied, provided of course that the result in the case of each petitioner, in the examination concerned, was disclosed by the respondent University prior to the cut off date i.e. 12.10.2015 as per the corrigendum Annexure P-2.

4