SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(MP) 573

BHAWANI SINGH, SHANTANU KEMKAR
SADASHIV SHIVRAM GARUD – Appellant
Versus
FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.K.GUPTA, Shobha Menon

BHAWANI SINGH, C. J.

( 1 ) THESELETTERS Patent Appeals (LPA no. 735/2002 - Sadashiv Garud v. Food corporation of India and others, LPA No. 772/2002 - Balwant Jayaram Birari v. Food corporation of India and others, LPA No. 773/2002 - Jagdish Chandra Littoriya v. Food corporation of India and others, and LPA No. 775/2002 - Madhukar Ramrao Kurhade v. Food Corporation of India and others are proposed to be decided by this judgment, since common questions arise for consideration and determination.

( 2 ) SARVASHRI Sadashiv Shivram Garud, balwant Jayaram Birari and Madhukar Ramrao kurhade are Assistant Grade-I (Depot) while jagdish Chandra Littoriya is Assistant Grade-II (Depot) in the Food Corporation of India (for short Corporation ). With regard to an incident of 1987-1988, the Corporation filed First information Report with the Central Bureau of investigation on 19/07/1991 against Shri R. A. Gupta, Assistant Manager (Depot), Shri R. K. Damani, Contractor, and Sri Pradeep K. Pandey (representative - R. K. Damani) under Sections 5 (l) (d) and 13 (l) (d) of the Prevention of corruption Act read with Sections 420/120-B of the Indian Penal Code. Investigation resulted in prosecution of the
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top