1. Shri A. S. Raizada, learned Counsel for Appellant.

Shri Sankalp Kochar, learned Counsel for Respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 4.

This intra-Court appeal arises from the order of learned Single Judge dated 17-8-2010 passed in W.P. No. 10392/2010(s) whereby the writ petition preferred by the Appellant has been dismissed.

2. Learned Counsel for the Appellant vehemently contended that pursuant to the advertisement, the Appellant was initially appointed as Regional Director, Western Region, National Council for Teacher Education, Bhopal. He drew our attention to the letter dated 5-12-2006 contained in Annexure-P/1 and submitted that in unequivocal terms, it was mentioned in the application that the Appellant has applied for the post of Regional Director, Bhopal. He, however, submitted that in the letter of appointment which is contained in Annexure-P/4 dated 2-6-2010, the Respondents have mentioned that the Appellant has been selected for appointment as Regional Director in WRC, NCTE, Bhopal on deputation basis and his services will be governed by the provisions contained in the Department of Personnel and Training OM No. 2/29/91-Estt.(Pay-II) dated 5th January, 1994. Thus there is no justi