SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(MP) 703

ANJULI PALO
Kundan – Appellant
Versus
State Of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K. Kurmi, Advocate, Rupesh Patel, Advocate, Girdhar Patel, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Anjuli Palo, J. - Learned counsel for the objector has submitted that he has filed Vakatnama on behalf of the complainant by provisional I.D. No.44710/2020 and he has no objection, if applicants are granted bail.

2. This is second application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. for grant of bail filed on behalf of applicants, who have been arrested in connection with Crime No.218/2020 registered at Police Station-Surkhi, District- Sagar for commission of offence under Sections 394/34 of the IPC.

3. First application of the applicants was dismissed by this Court vide order dated 20.8.2020 passed in M.Cr.C. No.25424/2020.

4. Learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that the applicants have been falsely implicated in the case. They are in custody since 29.06.2020. The complainant has filed an affidavit stating that due to some dispute about money, he had called the police on the spot and thereafter, the applicants were arrested by the police. It is also submitted that due to outbreak of Corona Virus pandemic, trial will take considerable time, hence, it is prayed that applicants be released on bail.

5. Learned Panel Lawyer for the State has strongly opposed the bail applicati

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top