SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(MP) 402

PRAKASH SHRIVASTAVA
Kallobai – Appellant
Versus
Babukhan – Respondent


Advocates:
Amit Agarwal for appellants; J.B. Mehta for respondents.

JUDGMENT

1. This Second Appeal was admitted on following substantial questions oflaw:1. Whether no consent of other co-sharers was required in law when the Will was only for 1/3rd share of the property?

2. Whether on the facts proved in the case, the plaintiffs are entitled to 1/5th share in the suit property?

2. Learned counsel for the appellant did not press the second question of law and confined his arguments to the first question only by giving up second question.

3. This is the plaintiff's appeal. Appellants are the daughters of Munawar and respondents No.1 to 3 are his sons and LRs No.1 to 4 are sons of deceased defendant Chitarkhan. The appellants had filed a civil suit raising the plea that Munawar khan had 1/2 share in the land admeasuring 7.05 hectares described in para-1 of the plaint. Munawar out of his share had bequeathed the land of survey No.2658 and 2660 admeasuring 0.99 hectares to the appellants by a registered Will dated 2.5.1987, therefore, they claimed to be owners of the said land by virtue of Will and in respect of remaining land of Munawar, they claimed 1/5th share each. Therefore, the suit was filed for declaration of title to the extent of the land c





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top