SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

PRAMOD KUMAR, M.A.BAKSHI
Graphite India Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.B. Desai,Sunil Kumar

ORDER

Per Pramod Kumar, A.M. - This appeal is directed against order dated 6th July, 1998, passed by learned CIT(A) XI Kolkata, in the matter of ascertainment of withholding tax liability from remittance made by the assessee to Mr. Frank Rusinko, an American Scientist, on account of consultancy charges.

2. The assessee’s grievance is that the authorities below ought to have held that the remittance in question did not fasten any withholding tax liability on the assessee inasmuch as, on the peculiar facts of this case, the same is covered by the scope of expression ‘independent personal services’ under Article 15 of Indo US Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement. As a corollary to this proposition, the assessee has also assailed the action of the authorities below in holding that the remittance in question is covered by the scope of expression ‘fees for included services’ appearing in Article 12 of Indo US Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement. Although the assessee has taken seven grounds of appeal, these grounds are, in substance, only arguments in support of these propositions. As a matter of convenience, therefore, we will take all these grounds of appeal together.

3. Briefly, the facts

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top