IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
N. Xavier Raj S/o. A.M. Nicholas – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent
ORDER :
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.
This Revision is filed against the order dated 28.02.2025 in Crl. M.P 2987/2022 in SC No.879/2017 by the Special Judge for the Trial of Offence under SC/ST (PoA), 1989, Ernakulam. It is an order dismissing the application under 227 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short Cr.PC)/250 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 ( BNSS ). The prayer of the petitioner to discharge is rejected by the Special Judge. Aggrieved by the same, this Revision is filed.
2. When this revision came up for consideration, this Court requested the counsel for the petitioner to argue about the maintainability of the revision, in the light of Sec. 14A of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short 'Act, 1989'). This Court also appointed Adv. K.R.Vinod as Amicus curiae in this case to help the court.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Public Prosecutor and the Amicus curiae.
4. Adv. Vinod, who is appointed as the amicus curiae, submitted that no revision is maintainable because it is an order which is appealable under Sec.14A of the Act 1989. The counsel relied on the judgment of the Full Bench of the
The dismissal of a discharge application is not an interlocutory order and is appealable under Section 14A of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, rather than being subject to revision.
An order rejecting a discharge application under the SC/ST Act is not interlocutory and is appealable under Section 14A, clarifying prior legal interpretations.
The main legal point established is that an order for interim maintenance under Section 125 of Cr.P.C is not an interlocutory order, allowing for the maintainability of criminal revision against such....
Appeal under Section 14-A of Schedule Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 is maintainable against orders passed by Special Court except against interlocutory orders.
A second criminal appeal against the same order rejecting bail is not maintainable after an initial dismissal under Section 14(A) of the Special Act.
The High Court's power to stay a discharge order must be exercised cautiously, as it significantly impacts the accused's liberty, requiring exceptional circumstances for such action.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.