SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 MarsdenLR 2022

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
MUTAYA SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
SURJIT KAUR TEJA SINGH & ANOR – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Cantius Leo,Harbhajan Kaur ,Respondent Advocate: Tharminder Singh,Ravindejit Laur (PDK)

JUDGMENT

Ahmad Bache J:

[Enclosure (42) - Order For Committal Against The Second Defendant

Enclosure (44) - To Set Aside The Judgment Dated 11 March 2019]

A. Brief Fact

[1] There was a consent judgment recorded between the Second Defendant (for both Defendants) vide Enclosure (38). Despite a lapse of 7 months, the Defendants still failed to comply with the Order and Judgment of this Court dated 11 March 2019 (on Order 14A Judgment), amongst others, was to account for the dealings in the land in question in the form of an affidavits.

[2] Consequently, vide Enclosure (42), the Plaintiff had made an application to this Court to commit the Second Defendant, Jasvinder Singh (as the First Defendant has died) for contempt of this Court.

[3] After hearing submissions from parties, this Court had found that the Second Defendant had committed contempt of Court. After hearing submissions on mitigation, this Court ordered the Contemnor/Second Defendant to pay a fine of RM35,000.00 within 2 months until 11 October 2022. In default, 1-month jail and cost of RM5,000.00 to be paid to the Plaintiff.

[4] Vide Enclosure (44), the Second Defendant had made an application to set aside the 11 March 2019 Order a


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top