Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
ISM SENDIRIAN BERHAD – Appellant
Versus
QUEENSWAY NOMINEES (TEMPATAN) SDN BHD & ORS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction to the originating summons and minority oppression claims. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 10) |
| 2. summary of arguments presented by both parties. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. court's observations on the necessity for oral evidence in disputed facts. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 4. legal basis for conversion application recognized by the court. (Para 26 , 27 , 30 , 33) |
Introduction
[1] In this case the Defendants' application for determination by this court is to convert the originating summons ('OS') filed by the Plaintiff to a writ action. The OS is premised on allegation of minority oppression under s 181 of the Companies Act 1965 on the Plaintiff by the Defendants.
Material Facts
[2] The facts only relevant for the purpose of this application are provided by the Defendants. There is no reason to depart from these facts as I find that it serves the purpose why the application for the conversion of the OS into a writ action is being made now. It is to be observed, as this is now only a preliminary application regarding the mode upon the hearing of the Plaintiff's case for minority oppression, the fact
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
