HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
ROTTA RESEARCH LABORATORIUM SPA & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
HO TACK SIEN & ORS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the judgment involves applications concerning breach of injunctions. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. the necessity of specifying periods in court orders dictates enforcement possibilities. (Para 3) |
| 3. the applicants must prove breaches beyond reasonable doubt. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. the final ruling considers compliance and penalties for breach. (Para 6) |
[1] This judgment concerns the following two applications (2 Applications) by the plaintiff companies (Applicants):
(1) in court enclosure no. 147 (Encl 147), the Applicants apply to court to cite the following respondents [Respondents (Encl 147)] for contempt of court regarding the breach of a judgment of Mah Weng Kwai JC (as he then was) dated 18 February 2011 (High court's Judgment):-
(a) Mr Ho Tack Sien (Mr Ho), the first defendant in this case. Mr Ho is a director of the third defendant company (3rd Defendant) and sixth defendant company (6th Defendant);
(b) Ms Chai Yuet Ying (Ms Chai), the second defendant in this case. Ms Chai is Mr Ho's wife as well as a director of the 3rd and 6th Defendants;
(c) Mr Hoo Kiow @ Mr Ho Fatt (Mr Hoo), a director of the 3rd Defendant;
(d) Ms Lee Yoke Thai (Ms Lee). Ms Lee is a director of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.