Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
SEAH PEI YEE – Appellant
Versus
HAP SENG STAR SDN BHD (ENCL 53) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaintiff's application for amendment of the judgment. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court's final order on the application. (Para 3) |
| 3. court's authority to amend clerical errors. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 4. connection between pleaded facts and relief sought. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. impact of solicitor's mistake on plaintiff's position. (Para 13 , 14) |
| 6. importance of justice over procedural technicalities. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
[1] This is the plaintiff's Application to amend the sealed Judgment and Order dated 29 January 2013 ("the Court Order") which Court Order was given after the Court allowed the plaintiff's Application for Summary Judgment vide encl 7 (see Judgment on encl 7 dated 13 February 2013).
[2] The main amendments sought by the plaintiff as outlined in exh SPY-6 of the plaintiff's Affidavit in Support affirmed on 15 April 2013 (encl 54), inter alia, are as underlined below:
"MAKA ADALAH PADA HARI INI DIHAKIMI seperti berikut:
a) Deklarasi bahawa Hap Seng Star Sdn Bhd (No Syarikat: 659844-H) (Selepas ini dirujuk sebagai "Defendan tersebut") perlu mengambil balik kereta no plat WWM 9696 dengan no enjin 27186030412835 dan no casis WDD2040486L055638 (Selepas ini dirujuk sebag
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
